Smith v smith 1948 4 sa 61 n
Web15 Feb 2013 · OPTIONS: A: Only Statement A is correct B: Only Statement B is correct C: Both Statements A and B are correct D: Both Statements A and B are incorrect QUESTION 2 Statement A: “In Smith v Smith 1948 4 SA 61(N) the marriage was set aside due to the fact that the wife was coerced into the marriage by duress”. Web[7] Smith v Smith 1948 (4) SA 61 (N) Consent to marriage induced by fear and duress. The plaintiff instituted an action for an order declaring her marriage to the defendant null and void. At the time of her marriage she was a minor.
Smith v smith 1948 4 sa 61 n
Did you know?
WebFAMILY LAW CASES Smith v Smith 1948 (4) SA 61 (N) Ex parte Dow 1987 (3) SA 829 (D) Guggenheim v Rosenbaum 1961 (4) SA 21 (W) Schnaar v Jansen 1924 NPD 218 … WebNo interest in this property was given to either plaintiff or defendant Dora Smith, but the judgment specifically provides that the property shall be the property of the defendant …
Webreference was made to the case of Smith v Smith 1948 (4) SA 61 (N) at pages 67 to 68; and the book by A. J. Kerr in The Principles of the Law of Contract (4th Ed.) at page 238, in support. 10. It was furthermore argued that the facts pleaded have established a case for actual threat that was caused by the Respondent. WebFAMILY LAW CASES Smith v Smith 1948 (4) SA 61 (N) Ex parte Dow 1987 (3) SA 829 (D) Guggenheim v Rosenbaum 1961 (4) SA 21 (W) Schnaar v Jansen 1924 NPD 218 Thelemann v Von Geyso 1957 (3) SA 39 (w) Viljoen v Viljoen 1944 CPD 137; Friedman v Harris 1928 CP 43 Davel v Swanepoel 1954 (1) SA 383 (A) Pienaar v Pienaar’s curator 1930 OPD 17 …
WebLooking for the best study guides, study notes and summaries about voidable? On this page you'll find 200 study documents about voidable. Web6/11/2016 SMITH v SMITH 1948 (4) SA 61 (N) Mrs. Ivins, the plaintiff's maternal grandmother, also gave evidence as to the plaintiff's state of mind, and she said that the …
WebJoan Ruth Smith appealed from a judgment and decree of divorce entered in the District Court for Grand Forks County. On appeal, Joan contends that the trial court lacked the requisite jurisdiction to render a judgment which dissolved the marital status of the parties and adjudicated the various incidences in their marriage.
WebFull title: DONALD F. SMITH, Appellant, v. ELEANOR D. SMITH, Respondent. Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. Date published: Apr 1, 1948 harness masters perthWeb12 Apr 2024 · The parties in a divorce and matrimonial property Action appealed and cross-appealed various aspects of the Trial Judge’s Decision. The husband appealed the Trial Judgment on the basis that, among other things, the Trial Judge erred with respect to the spousal support award, division of matrimonial property and Costs. chapter 406 florida statutesWebGladys Vera Smith petitioned the Supreme Court of Victoria for divorce on the ground - under s. 75 (a) of the Marriage Act 1928 (Vict.) - that her husband, without just cause or excuse, … harness manufacturing companyWeb16 Mar 2001 · Case No 112/2000. In the matter between: WARREN DEAN SMITH Appellant. and. LISA VIVIENNE SMITH Respondent. CORAM: HEFER ACJ, SMALBERGER ADCJ et … chapter 409 fsWebPage 3 of 4 SMITH v. SMITH. [1948] P. 77. to bring the proviso into operation is the communication to the husband of such facts as would carry the conviction to the mind of … harness master rutherfordWeb"Myrtle Harmon Smith and Robert Daniel Smith were married to each other in South Carolina in 1938. On May 26, 1939, a daughter, Agnes Carolyn Smith, was born of this marriage. The family lived together until about May, 1945, except for a few months early in 1944, during which Robert Daniel Smith served in the United States Navy. harness master nsw pty limitedWebSmith v Smith 1948 (4) SA 61 (N) Sterling Products International Ltd v Zulu 1988 (2) ZLR 293 (S) Union Government (Min of Finance) v Gowar 1915 AD 426 Zulu v Sterling … chapter 407 rsmo