Overbroad objection to discovery
WebIf any interrogatory is objectionable because of overbreadth, the responding party, although objecting, must answer the interrogatory to the extent that the interrogatory is not overbroad. In other words, an objection for overbreadth does not relieve the duty to respond to an extent that is not overbroad, while a party awaits a judicial ... http://elawexchange.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=510&Itemid=552
Overbroad objection to discovery
Did you know?
Webhearings (on discovery issues) to permit the Arbitrator to monitor and guide the discovery process. Such hearings, even if only brief check- in calls, may tend to focus the attention of the Parties on the discovery planning process. Discove ry Deadline: The establishment of a discovery deadline is a matter of balance
WebMay 1, 2024 · May 1, 2024. Discovery requests from plaintiffs’ attorneys can be overly broad in an attempt to obtain records the defendant does not have to provide. However, the bar is high when making that claim to the court. The defense can object to what it considers an overly broad discovery request, but the objection often is unsuccessful because the ... WebSuperior Court, supra, 218 Cal. App. 2d 460, 464-465), and no reason appears why such an interrogatory should not be permitted under this principle where, as here, the answer consists solely of a disfavored overbroad general denial which gives the plaintiff no guidance whatsoever regarding what specific matters legitimately are at issue and …
WebAug 15, 2024 · Objections to Written Discovery Requests: Overly Broad. An overly broad discovery request lacks specificity as to time, place, and/or subject matter being … WebSep 13, 2024 · Discovery requests may also be untimely under Code Civil Procedure Section 2024.020, which sets the "close of discovery" at 30 days before trial. There are many ways …
WebAn important objection in responding to any e-discovery request is that privileged documents may be located within the vast inventory of electronic data requested by the plaintiff. The party asserting privilege has the burden to establish it, as well as the likelihood that the privileged information is located within the scope of information sought by the …
Webten discovery to state all applicable objections in your initial written response. There are exceptions to waiver; for example, a delayed objection on the grounds of privacy. (Heda v. … city and guilds invigilation guidelines 2020Webobjection to the discovery request and order at issue. ... These liberal bounds, however, have limits, and “discovery requests must not be overbroad.” Id. A request is not overbroad “so long as it is ‘reasonably tailored to include only matters relevant to the case.’” Id. (quoting Texaco, Inc. v. Sanderson, 898 S.W.2d 813, city and guilds invigilation packWebDiscovery should generally be obtained from the most convenient, least burdensome, and least expensive source. In reality, however, it is unlikely that any one source will meet this … city and guilds horticulture level 2Weboverbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it attempts to extend the scope of this document request to ... ” as that term is defined. Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, in responding to these discovery requests, Plaintiff will treat the term “third party,” as extending to all individuals and entities, not named as parties ... city and guilds invigilation policyWebLast, but not least, please keep in mind that discovery is allowed to be quite broad. The ultimate standard is whether the request is “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.010.) Needless to say, it is unusual for a court to sustain an objection based solely upon that ground. city and guilds introduction to hospitalityWebOct 8, 2024 · Responding party is not relieved of their obligations because they believe propounding party has the documents. See C.C.P. § § 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230 and … city and guilds in sri lankaWebJan 19, 2010 · Hyundai objected to many of these discovery requests as “overly broad and unduly burdensome” and produced limited documents. Magaña did not move to compel further discovery at that point, nor did Hyundai move for a protective order. Magaña prevailed at trial and was awarded more than $8 million in damages. city and guilds invigilator